Long-term results and quality of life after stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Doppler-guided HAL-RAR: a propensity score matching analysis.

AIM: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the short and long-term outcomes of doppler-guided (DG) hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) using a wireless-doppler-guided probe and stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) for treatment of II-III hemorrhoids. METHODS: This cohort study included patients who underwent HAL-RAR (n = 89) or SH (n = 174) for grade II-III hemorrhoids between January 2020 and December 2021. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 76 patients for each group were analyzed. Short and long-term outcomes were collected. Pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at POD1, POD 10, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. The enrolled patients completed the Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD quality of life (HDSS/SHS QoL) questionnaire preoperatively and during a regular follow-up visit at 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Groups exhibited comparable overall postoperative complication rates (23% HAL-RAR/ 21% SH; p = 0.295). Postoperative pain via VAS showed median scores of 4, 3, 1, 1 for HAL-RAR and 6, 4, 2, 1 for SH at POD1, POD10, 1 month, and 6 months, respectively (p = < 0.001, 0.004, 0.025, 0.019). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the recurrence rate was 10.5% in the HAL-RAR group and 9.2% in the SH group (p = 0.785), respectively. At 24 months, 15.7% of HAL-RAR patients and 19.7% of SH patients remained symptomatic (p = 0.223). Median post-op QoL index was 1 (HAL-RAR) and 0.92 (SH), p = 0.036. CONCLUSIONS: HAL-RAR is a safe and feasible technique in treating grade II-III hemorrhoids showing better outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and QoL. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper adds a new perspective in comparing the HAL-RAR and SH, focusing the attention on the patients and not surgical techniques. A long and difficult follow-up was completed to fully understand the long-term results and the impact on the QoL of the patients who underwent these procedures.

Short-term cyclosporine therapy and cotransplantation of donor splenocytes: effects on graft rejection and survival rates in pigs subjected to renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific allogeneic loading can prolong the survival of solid organ transplants by inducing a state known as acceptance. Several populations of cells are known to be involved in this process, but their exact roles have yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of portal-vein transfusion of donor-specific splenocytes (DST) after short-term cyclosporine A (CyA) therapy in pigs subjected to renal transplantation. METHODS: Four groups of unrelated swine underwent renal transplantation with removal of the native kidneys. Antirejection protocols consisted in portal-vein DST (3 x 10(8) cells/kg) (Group 2, n = 7); intravenous CyA (9 mg/kg/d) on postoperative days 1-12 (Group 3, n = 14); and DST + CyA (as described above) (Group 4, n = 13). Results (through postoperative day 90) were compared with those obtained in untreated control recipients (Group 1, n = 7). RESULTS: Compared with animals of Groups 1, 2, and 3, Group 4 recipients presented significantly longer survival (mean: 90 days, P < 0.01 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) and better renal function (P < 0.05). Graft histology revealed preserved parenchyma. CONCLUSION: The role of spleen cells in the immune response has probably been underestimated. Cotransplantation of donor splenocytes seems to induce a certain degree of acceptance toward the renal allograft. The route of administration (portal-vein infusion in this study) may be crucial for developing favorable mechanisms of recognition.